OK, thank you for the link. I know don't feel comfortable with the notion of lib. I currently assume that it is more or less similar to a namespace : it looks like a namespace, it tastes like a namespace, but still does seem to be not considered a namespace.
In which ways does the notion of "lib" offer something different from the notion of "namespace", currently ? I can see a value if a lib can be a collection of namespaces. Then it would be closer to the notion of "unit of reuse / distribution" -> clojure is a lib, clojure-contrib is a lib ... But it does not seem to be the case, or is it just that the documentation I read isn't up to date, too ? I also think that the notion of lib is a step towards dependency management : what libs a lib needs to compile (maybe libs that contain macros that are not needed after the compilation step), what libs are lib needs to run. And also a version number for the lib. On 16 déc, 19:58, Daniel Eklund <[email protected]> wrote: > > If I'm wrong, could you please help me understand, maybe by giving me > > a URL I may have missed ? > > > Regards, > > > -- > > Laurent PETIT > > yes it is out of date... check the post 5 posts down: > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/4a4c2e3e7aab... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
