Rich: You make the distinction that streams are not non-caching seqs. I read this as meaning that they wont implement ISeq, they will implement IStream, but conceptually they would be a non-caching "sequence" (in the English phrase sense, as opposed to seq in the interface sense), and they should be referred to as streams because sequence has a well defined and different meaning.
Mark: You seem unsatisfied with the promise of "streams" which to me sound to be precisely what you describe as "non-caching seqs". Am I missing some important point of functional difference? Regards, Tim. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
