Then why are sets callable? Not that I'm complaining - I found it handy, then came to wonder why lists aren't.
-Ethan > I'd just like to add to this discussion that maps and vectors are > functions not just because it's neat or possible, with the > implementation one of many possibilities, but because they are > associative, and associative collections are inherently functions of > their keys/indices. > > Lists/seqs are not associative, thus not functions. > > Rich --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
