On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Christian Vest Hansen <karmazi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Mark H. <mark.hoem...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Jan 15, 1:38 am, stuhood <stuh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The benchmark contains 4 bi-directional dictionary implementations: ... >> >> Doesn't Java already have a more optimized thread-safe hash table that >> works by locking individual buckets, rather than the whole table? >> Maybe I'm just confused ;-P
Ah! but a mere hash table is not bi-directional :-) -- Venlig hilsen / Kind regards, Christian Vest Hansen. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
