Sorry for the quad-post, but I just noticed: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/6ac273446b4a7183 And actually that is what made the big difference in performance (I'd done a svn update for something unrelated). So I guess two mysteries solved with one patch! Boris I suggest you try to re-run your test on your quad-core with the latest SVN, as I don't think my laptop is really representative.
On Jan 17, 1:20 am, Timothy Pratley <timothyprat...@gmail.com> wrote: > On a hunch I rearranged such that the agents are not recreated for > each run, but instead are reused from a pre-established > set:http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/web/mt2.2.clj > > Strangely (from my understanding of agents) this has a significant > impact on the result!!! > > threads: 1 > "Elapsed time: 1447.388146 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 117.655457 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 247.283942 msecs" > threads: 2 > "Elapsed time: 2064.69705 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 630.112486 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 396.592304 msecs" > threads: 3 > "Elapsed time: 3026.769883 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 1188.845789 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 634.070252 msecs" > threads: 4 > "Elapsed time: 4240.550405 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 2421.342098 msecs" > "Elapsed time: 980.957356 msecs" > > Note all the tests are scaling up and the second two tests are > dramatically faster. > o_O --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
