On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Mark Volkmann
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> What is the drawback of the (some #{:y} [:x :y :z]) idiom? Is it too
>> verbose? Too slow? Too flexible? Too good a re-use of existing
>> functionality? Too helpful in opening ones eyes to the possibilities
>> of sets and higher order functions?
>
> I vote for too verbose. ;-)
(some #{:y] [:x :y :z]) is fewer characters than
(includes? :y [:x :y :z]) so your vote of "too verbose" is hard to justify.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
