On Jan 29, 7:10 pm, Jason Wolfe <jawo...@berkeley.edu> wrote:
> I think this is not a bug in disj. disj takes a *set* and an element
> as input. nil is the empty seq, which is different from the empty set
> #{}.
Well, then forget my remark about disj and let's concentrate on the
set functions. Those operate on sets *but* it is highly inconsistent
to allow nil as a second argument but not as a first if both
parameters should accept the same type.
> The fact that clojure.set functions work at all on things other
> than bona fide sets is, in Rich's words, "an implementation artifact
> and not a promise of the interface".
Hm. Maybe these weakly typed languages are not made for me.
- nt
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
