On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Jan Rychter <[email protected]> wrote:

> From what I read, the reasoning is that Clojure provides extremely
> general multimethods where you have to define a dispatch function. On
> the object side, there is metadata and you can do with it whatever you
> want. But this seems to leave a gaping hole saying "fill me with an
> object system". Is the goal for everyone to roll their own?

Hi,

Just curious, have you seen the "a la carte hierarchies" scheme that
Rich worked up last summer?

http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_frm/thread/9cc9926de1bdb128?pli=1

Best,
Graham

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to