I can see arguments either way. Certainly for the core library, short names are a plus. We don't want to litter our code with (get-first-element-of-seq x), but for less common routines from the libraries, the longer names may help readability a lot.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Phlex <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Jason Wolfe wrote: > > Not yet, but perhaps soon. Code is here: > > > > http://code.google.com/p/clojure-contrib/issues/detail?id=8 > > > > -Jason > > > > Would you consider changing the names of these 2 functions ? > > random-permutation -> shuffle > random-element -> one-of > > Shorter names are a trademark of clojure. > "one-of" was taken straight from paip =) > > Sacha > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
