On Feb 22, 7:59 pm, Rob <rob.nikan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How about having this function call .getColumnLabel instead
> of .getColumnName. That way, you can do a join with duplicate column
> names and rename them in the SQL query...
>
> select name name1, name name2, ... from ...
>
> and resultset-seq won't throw an exception. ?
>
Sounds good to me - any drawbacks to this? Does it require that the
columns be named explicitly?
Rich
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
