Looking at the code, lcons does indeed require two parms. I must've been zoned out when I wrote the comment. Thanks for catching that.
On Feb 26, 9:10 am, Pierpaolo Bernardi <olopie...@gmail.com> wrote: > no. in scheme (and in all modern lisps), cons is a 2 arguments procedure. > Giving it 1 is an error. > > Some very old lisp dialects supplied NIL in place of missing arguments. In > these lisps > (cons 1) was equivalent to (cons 1 nil) > > Cheers > P. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
