Allen Rohner <aroh...@gmail.com> writes: >> I agree regarding concatenation as well, but I think the case for >> comparison of non-numerics is still pretty strong. > > Are you referring to using <, >, =, with objects that implement > java.lang.Comparable? > > i.e. given x.compareTo(y) == -1 > (< x y) > => true > > I would find that useful.
I'm not sure of the details since I don't know much about Java, but that sounds about right. I'm working on a date library, and having to use functions like earlier? and later? rather than >, <, <=, and >= feels awkward. -Phil --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
