On Mar 4, 2:46 pm, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Mibu <mibu.cloj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why does range in Clojure use an inclusive-exclusive range? > For what it's worth, Python's range function works the same way.
I think Clojure's design leans towards what's right more than what's custom even if it breaks old habits, so I am curious why wasn't this bad habit broken as well. Is it just convention, bad as it is? Or maybe I'm missing some hidden good reason for using this confusing (to me) range over an inclusive range. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---