That's a good point. Does such usage cause some failure, or is it a performance issue? I would think that prior generations' code (classes + classloader(s)) would get GC'd as necessary -- or is the number of created classloaders so significant as to hit some serious limitation?
- Chas On Mar 4, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Jeffrey Straszheim wrote: > Many people consider the use of eval in "normal" code to be bad > style. However, there are times when it is justified, such as > genetic programming or dynamic code loading. In these cases Clojure > falls down without the classloader trick. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
