>I think that a
> shared syntax for both macros and functions calls is a flaw in the
> syntax of Lisps, because you can't tell, just by looking at a form,
> which expressions get evaluated and which don't, at least when you are
> dealing with side effects.
You might want to think about macros such as 'or' and 'and', which
only evaluate as many arguments as needed. A naming or case convention
wouldn't help you to know what gets evaluated in these macros.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
