> The main thing that makes me hesitate to suggest this is getting bottlenecked on Clojure's dev process.
Imo this is a big deal. I like the way specter has the ability to add new generally useful navigators and paths with new versions as people "discover" them, I don't think that's a great fit for the overhead of a language release process. On Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 8:02:55 AM UTC+11, Nathan Marz wrote: > > One of the most common questions I get about Specter is whether it will > ever become part of Clojure core. I think it's an interesting proposal and > would like to see what the community and core team thinks. > > The primary reason for contributing would be that Specter makes Clojure a > stronger language. For a language that embraces simplicity, I've always > viewed the complexity of dealing with nested data structures a glaring > weakness of Clojure. The existing stuff in Clojure, like clojure.walk, > zippers, update-in, etc., just doesn't cut it. This problem is very common, > and Specter completely solves it with near-optimal performance. > > The main thing that makes me hesitate to suggest this is getting > bottlenecked on Clojure's dev process. However, Specter is very well > developed at this point so it doesn't need to move fast anymore. > > Please share your thoughts. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
