On Mar 5, 3:28 am, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 3. What would you predict to be the most efficient way to implement a
> (non-destructive) double-dimensioned array?:
>     a) A vector of vectors.
>     b) A hash map that correlates [i j] pairs with values.
>     c) A flat vector, and write lookup and assoc functions that use
> i*columns+j as the index.

I'm guessing (a) for small, non-sparse vectors, (b) for large, sparse
vectors, and (c) for large, non-sparse vectors. Totally untested,
unverified, and unsubstantiated. :)

-Stuart Sierra
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to