On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 10:33:43 AM UTC-6, Mars0i wrote: > > On Monday, March 6, 2017 at 9:32:37 AM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote: >> >> Ok, this looks like it's related to the macro gen, so I don't see any >> issue to fix in the spec - valid inputs at the point are either strings or >> symbols - I think through eval you were ending up with a class instance. >> > > OK, that makes sense. The new version with the added quote works with > 1.8.0 as well as 1.9.0--no doubt that's what you'd expect. I wouldn't have > to known for sure until I tried it. Use of gen-class can seem like a black > art sometimes :-) but I'm glad it's available. >
Of course the problem arose due to my decision to dabble, imperfectly, in the black art of macro-writing (which I usually can avoid). btw when I first saw the 1.9.0 error dump I thought it was horrible--worse than a simple Java stacktrace. It was pretty ugly because my macro had generated a very large expression. Once I figured out what the spec output was saying, though, I realized how incredibly helpful it was. Very nice. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
