>
> multi-spec doesn't require you to use a key of a map - it's an arbitrary
> function on arbitrary data, so it could leverage satisfies? or other
> protocol functionality.
>
Oh, that's good to know, but I'm talking other way around. Where I can
dispatch based on what the spec is for a given data-structure.
Like if I could do this:
(defprotocol Bar
(bar [this]))
(s/def ::name string?)
(s/def ::id int?)
(s/def ::person (s/keys :req [::name]))
(s/def ::item (s/keys :req [::id]))
(extend ::person
Bar
{:bar (fn [this] (::name this))})
(extend ::item
Bar
{:bar (fn [this] (::id this))})
(bar {::name "John Doe"})
(bar {::id 1234})
On Wednesday, 29 March 2017 13:15:06 UTC-7, Alex Miller wrote:
>
> multi-spec doesn't require you to use a key of a map - it's an arbitrary
> function on arbitrary data, so it could leverage satisfies? or other
> protocol functionality.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
