| I would have had to re-spec all the intermediate functions I'm not able to follow how that is?
You would have only needed this if you are somewhere validating or have setup test.check to run. In both cases, if you wanted to validate, why don't you also want to validate this new field? Or why not test.check your code with it? Also, if you had a keys spec for this map, it would only require you adding one key to that one spec. Why would all your intermediate functions not share the same map spec? Anyhow, I'm not arguing against open key specs, I'm arguing for adding to spec a closed keys spec. Either as an option to s/keys or another spec macro. There clearly a large number of people who seem to have use cases for both, and implementing your own is non trivial, I think it would be a great addition to spec for practical completeness. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
