Hi, is it expected that code which does a lot of regex parsing is ~14% slower than it was under Clojure 1.8?
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Shantanu Kumar <kumar.shant...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, my bad. I can see the same behavior in previous Clojure versions > too. I discovered this in the middle of moving to 1.9.0-RC1 in one of > the projects and somehow got it all mixed up. > > > Shantanu > > On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 11:36:30 UTC+5:30, Andy Fingerhut wrote: >> >> I see the same behavior in Clojure 1.7.0 and 1.8.0 as you see in >> 1.9.0-RC1. >> >> Andy >> >> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Shantanu Kumar <kumar.s...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Sorry, I did not specify the problem completely earlier. The coercion >>> fails only when *uncheked-math* is set to truthy in 1.9.0-RC1. >>> >>> user=> (byte \a) >>> 97 >>> user=> (set! *unchecked-math* true) ; or :warn-on-boxed >>> true >>> user=> (byte \a) >>> >>> ClassCastException java.lang.Character cannot be cast to >>> java.lang.Number clojure.lang.RT.uncheckedByteCast (RT.java:1376) >>> >>> >>> Shantanu >>> >>> On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:27:36 UTC+5:30, Alex Miller wrote: >>>> >>>> Works for me in 1.9.0-RC1. I don't know of anything that changed in >>>> this area. >>>> >>>> Clojure 1.9.0-RC1 >>>> user=> (byte \a) >>>> 97 >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Shantanu Kumar <kumar.s...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The coercion (byte \a) works fine in Clojure 1.8, but it fails with >>>>> `ClassCastException java.lang.Character cannot be cast to >>>>> java.lang.Number` >>>>> in 1.9.0-RC1. Is this by design? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Shantanu >>>>> >>>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>> your first post. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
