Another link to "why so": https://gist.github.com/reborg/dc8b0c96c397a56668905e2767fd697f#why-clojure-doesnt-have-a-generic-insert-lookup-append-that-works-the-same-on-all-collections If you still, need this, take a look: https://github.com/cloojure/tupelo#adding-values-to-the-beginning-or-end-of-a-sequence
вторник, 17 июля 2018 г., 3:21:02 UTC+7 пользователь Christian Seberino написал: > > I'm impressed with Clojure syntax and I'm still a beginner. > > I noticed conj behaves differently for lists and vectors. I also noticed > cons does not return a vector for a vector input. > > Is there any downside to make 2 macros...prepend and append that behave > the same for lists and vectors, and also, > return same types as inputs? > > If I'm not mistaken, I believe it is for performance reasons that these > are not already in the standard language? > For those that care about performance, it would be beholden on them to > pick the correct macro for their > specific data structure. > > Good idea? > > Thanks! > > Chris > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
