I would not use keyword namespaces in this situation. Users of the "fetch"
function will likely type :timeout, :status, and :body when using this
function. Keyword namespaces would just force users to type longer names
for these.
On Sunday, September 30, 2018 at 9:45:56 PM UTC-4, Michael Gardner wrote:
>
> I'm looking for some feedback on keyword namespacing. Say you're writing
> an API to be used by external clients that works something like this:
>
> (fetch url :timeout 10)
> => {:status 200, :body "..."}
>
> Would you namespace the :status and :body keywords in the response? What
> about the :timeout kwarg in the function call? Why or why not?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
