How about using exception instances as errors? That plays pretty nicely with ex-info and (try ... (catch Exception e e)). I've built https://github.com/dawcs/flow on top of that approach and that seems like pretty good abstraction. Despite I'm not sure about CLJS. Anomalies are also great and you may check out https://github.com/dawcs/anomalies-tools for some tooling around it. But you may still need a bridge to convert exceptions caught from 3rd-party java libs into anomalies structure. And despite Cognitect roots, it doesn't feel like "official standard".
пятница, 26 октября 2018 г., 4:46:54 UTC+3 пользователь Didier написал: > > I've started to see a pattern in my spec like this: > > (s/or :success string? > :error ::error) > > And I've been tempted to create my own spec macro for this. But I also > thought, maybe Spec itself should have such a spec. > > (s/error <success-spec> <error-spec>) > > What do people think? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
