if I'm not mistaken, the usage of apply in the api ns ensures that the
method will only be found if "opts" is exactly one opt, otherwise the
arity won't be found and that will be reported as no such method

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:37 AM Dimitrios Jim Piliouras
<jimpil1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, here is the protocol definition:
> https://github.com/jimpil/cryptohash-clj/blob/master/src/cryptohash_clj/proto.clj
>
> Here are the implementations (notice the two public fns at the end of each 
> file):
> https://github.com/jimpil/cryptohash-clj/tree/master/src/cryptohash_clj/impl
>
> And here is the api with the two multi-methods:
> https://github.com/jimpil/cryptohash-clj/blob/master/src/cryptohash_clj/api.clj
>
> Everything works as expected inside the impl namespaces, but not in the api 
> namespace, even though all it does is to delegate to some impl ns.
>
> Thanks again...
>
> Kind regards,
> Dimitris
>
> ps: this repo is WIP
>
>
> On 21 Nov 2019, at 23:43, Justin Smith <noisesm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> on rereading I've clearly misunderstood you, I think we need to see
> actual code reproducing this error in order to know what failed here
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 3:42 PM Justin Smith <noisesm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> there is no foo/x unless you defined one - the protocol function is
> created by defprotocol and is not owned by the object implementing the
> protocol
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 3:29 PM Dimitrios Jim Piliouras
> <jimpil1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> But the call-chain is api/x-with-foo => foo/x => proto/X so it does bottom 
> out in the ns the protocol was defined in. It's just that the middle step 
> could come from 3 different namespaces all containing protocol extensions.
>
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2019, 23:03 Justin Smith, <noisesm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> it might be helpful to consider that in the jvm methods are not data,
> and the proto function makes the method into concrete data belongs to
> the namespace that owns the protocol
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 2:58 PM Justin Smith <noisesm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> if you define proto method x, it belongs to the protocol namespace no
> matter where it is called, and calling it as if it belonged to the
> namespace defining the object extending the protocol will and should
> fail
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:57 PM Dimitrios Jim Piliouras
> <jimpil1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> This has me completely stumped - I would massively appreciate a helping hand! 
> Suppose the following simple directory structure:
>
>
> — someProject.impl.{foo.clj, bar.clj,baz.clj}
> — someProject.proto.clj
> — someProject.api.clj
>
> `proto.clj` contains a single protocol with two methods - let’s call them X & 
> Y. Each implementation namespace (foo, bar, baz), requires 
> `[someProject.proto :as proto]`,  extends it to 3 types (bytes/chars/String), 
> and defines two public fns x & y which delegate to `proto/X` & `proto/Y` 
> respectively. Everything is good so far. I can fire up a REPL, load any of 
> the impl  namespaces (foo, bar, baz), call the corresponding x or y fn and 
> get the right result.
>
> Now, I want to provide a unified API so that the caller doesn’t need to 
> (potentially) require 3 namespaces. Hence the `someProject.api` ns, which 
> contains require clauses for all impl namespaces + two multi-methods `X-with` 
> & `Y-with` with 3 implementations (`defmethod`) each. Each implementation 
> delegates to the x or y fn in the right impl namespace. In other words,  
> `X-with :foo` calls `(foo/x)`, `X-with :bar` calls `(bar/x)` etc etc. 
> Remember, that calling x or y inside any impl namespace works correctly, so 
> all I’m doing here is providing a multi-method wrapper. However, things don’t 
> work as I was expecting in this namespace…Loading `someProject.api` in a 
> fresh REPL and calling  `X-with :foo` bottoms out at the protocol extension 
> for X in the baz ns, which is the last require clause in the api namespace.
>
> So basically,  the protocol extensions in each impl namespace work fine when 
> called from their wrapper fn in the namespace they were defined, but don’t 
> quite work when the same wrapper fn is called from some other namespace! What 
> am I missing? :(
>
> Many thanks in advance…
> Dimitris
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/A549FB15-0B12-4E20-9D98-4F5A56330DC4%40gmail.com.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAGokn9%2B1ZiFHBzuS_bwSyrx0DsM_ocu7dk844DnU-h5D3b9fzA%40mail.gmail.com.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAE3Kzw%2B6BqfX3di1xgE8UM2ngpBBhdzCi4GpCEtAeVX56oyGEg%40mail.gmail.com.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAGokn9%2BPgbiZxq-n7L%3DgLhqNB2z-OdCaTOx7uJA5zG2NavJLiQ%40mail.gmail.com.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/767A3F45-4F93-42ED-93B3-36B962FEC918%40gmail.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/CAGokn9Ku9EzcvMH58nrpuMscSy-JjOD2fiQ-vnU%3Dg7Gm2DgHpQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to