Rich Hickey has pushed using solid domain names before, and I'm super glad to see more progress on that front. But it's unfortunate if the tools castigate the victim, not the perpetrator. Wouldn't Clojars be a better point for enforcement? Has the question been raised with Clojars?
Alex's advice reminds me of a pioneering ClojureScript React-wrapping library whose groupId is a domain that belongs to someone else. The funny thing is that this is the library's *second* squatting. The first one lasted only briefly; folks pointed out the domain was already used for an unflattering website. So then the maintainers picked a domain that no one had registered at the time. Risky! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/clojure/88400d9e-9c68-4098-9321-7cfb89e92be8o%40googlegroups.com.
