I can try that.
More generally, is it possible that I'm just doing this whole thing
wrong? That using vectors to represent binary fields and records in a
declarative is just a bad idea and that I should try and explore lower-
level alternatives?
Vincent
On Mar 23, 3:35 pm, Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net> wrote:
> Hi Vincent!
>
> Vincent Foley a écrit :
>
> > Using the new versions of null-string and read-field-aux that you gave
> > me, in my real application, the execution time went from 160 seconds
> > to 150 seconds. As for using macros, I wrote one for the example
> > program, but I realized that it wouldn't work in my application,
> > because I sometimes use (apply parse-buffer buf field-vector).
>
> I looked at your program, you can use macros there too.
>
> Given compile-fields a function that outputs the code of a closure
> taking a ByteBuffer as only argument then you can rewrite action as a
> macro like this:
>
> (defmacro action
> [name & v-forms]
> {:name name
> :fields (compile-fields v-forms)}) and replace (apply parse-buffer
> buf fields) with (fields buf).
>
> Do you think it's feasible?
>
> --
> Professional:http://cgrand.net/(fr)
> On Clojure:http://clj-me.blogspot.com/(en)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
