I can try that. More generally, is it possible that I'm just doing this whole thing wrong? That using vectors to represent binary fields and records in a declarative is just a bad idea and that I should try and explore lower- level alternatives?
Vincent On Mar 23, 3:35 pm, Christophe Grand <christo...@cgrand.net> wrote: > Hi Vincent! > > Vincent Foley a écrit : > > > Using the new versions of null-string and read-field-aux that you gave > > me, in my real application, the execution time went from 160 seconds > > to 150 seconds. As for using macros, I wrote one for the example > > program, but I realized that it wouldn't work in my application, > > because I sometimes use (apply parse-buffer buf field-vector). > > I looked at your program, you can use macros there too. > > Given compile-fields a function that outputs the code of a closure > taking a ByteBuffer as only argument then you can rewrite action as a > macro like this: > > (defmacro action > [name & v-forms] > {:name name > :fields (compile-fields v-forms)}) and replace (apply parse-buffer > buf fields) with (fields buf). > > Do you think it's feasible? > > -- > Professional:http://cgrand.net/(fr) > On Clojure:http://clj-me.blogspot.com/(en) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---