On Mar 24, 11:53 pm, e <evier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> does anyone else think that should be more fundamental like the python
> example? imagine saying that out loud to your friend who asks . . . and the
> amount of noise, visually:
>
> "use clojure dot contrib dot duck dash streams".
>
> perhaps it is already the hope that it will "spit" will eventually sit next
> to "slurp"?
>
This has come up before on the list.
I am not sure about where things stand with that though.
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/31f01808c225ecc1/d0e286fa0c8ef7d2
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/d8064dbb94c5cd2c/ba355cfe2c708068
I think it would be nice to have "spit" in the core, especially for
people like me who aren't too good with java. But having
clojure-contrib.duck-streams definately makes life easier :)
Parth
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
