On Apr 6, 11:29 am, Jason Sankey <ja...@zutubi.com> wrote: > I think there may be a misunderstanding over "combining" here - I read > Stuart's mail to mean there was no obvious way to combine > duck-streams/file and java-utils/file, whereas this implementation shows > java-utils/file style behaviour only?
As far as I'm aware, it has most of both behaviours. > IMO even if the two functions could be combined, it would be confusing > to understand how the arguments passed in would be joined. Better not > to try. That's true. Conceptually, I prefer the java-utils/file method, which is basically the same as an identically named function I wrote for Compojure. The problem with having java-utils/file and duck-streams/file is that you lose the ability to load both namespaces at the same time without defining an exception for the file function. This does not seem like an ideal solution. I think we should choose one or the other, give them different names, or attempt to merge their functionality. - James --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
