On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Stephen C. Gilardi <squee...@mac.com> wrote: > > On May 1, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Michael Wood wrote: > >> I don't think it's so hard and fast. I think of it more like somefunc >> is the usual thing, and somefunc* is similar, but not as commonly >> used. Maybe someone else has a better explanation/definition. > > The special forms are documented at http://clojure.org/special_forms. It's > that definitive description of the behavior of each special form that > Clojure programmers should program to. Exactly how a special form is > implemented is not a promise of the Clojure language. Instead, it's an > internal detail of a specific implementation of Clojure.
Yes, I was not talking about special forms. Only the naming convention of having similarly named functions/macros where the names differ only in that one of them has an asterisk appended, and whether all things with trailing asterisks were "private". -- Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
