Janico Greifenberg a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I encountered unexpected behavior of the 'if' form in clojure when using 
> instances of java.lang.Boolean as the condition. I wanted to convert 
> input strings to booleans and used the constructor of the Boolean class 
> with the string parameter. However, when I pass these values as a 
> condition to if, the true-branch always gets executed. For example:
>
>  > (if (Boolean. "true") 1 2)
> 1
>  > (if (Boolean. "false") 1 2)
> 1
>
> It seems to me that this has to do with the identity of the objects, as 
> (Boolean. "false") is not identical (although equal) to the clojure 
> literal false. Is this behavior intentional or a bug?
>
> The problem does not occur when I use Boolean/parseBoolean which returns 
> a lower case boolean.
>   

It's intentional, Rich said "for efficiency only canonic false is 
logical false in
Clojure." in http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/81ba3175da9a877c

Workaround:
 > (if (boolean (Boolean. "false")) 1 2)
2

Christophe

-- 
Professional: http://cgrand.net/ (fr)
On Clojure: http://clj-me.blogspot.com/ (en)



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to