If that's the case, would I even get a performance increase, or would the cast overhead cost more than the implicit reflection?
On May 14, 11:32 am, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > This baffled me as well. You need to cast to int. > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:22 AM, tmountain <tinymount...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm trying to optimize some code I've written, and I have set warn on > > reflection as advised. I'm having a hard time getting a simple > > statement to avoid reflection. > > > user=> (== (byte 0x1) (byte 0x1)) > > Reflection warning, line: 33 - call to equiv can't be resolved. > > > Can you use type hints on primitive types? I've tried obvious stuff > > like: > > > user=> (== #^byte (byte 0x1) #^byte (byte 0x1)) > > Reflection warning, line: 4 - call to equiv can't be resolved. > > > and other variations without success. > > > Thanks, > > Travis --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---