On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Andrew Wagner <[email protected]> wrote:
>> You can use destructuring in your predicate's arg list:
>
>  Not to hijack the thread but...is there some reason clojure doesn't just
> just call this pattern-matching? Is it different somehow?

Why doesn't Ruby just call it destructuring like Lisp has been doing
for decades?  ;)

(Actually I know next to nothing about Ruby and its pattern matching
and not much more about Lisp.)

-- 
Michael Wood <[email protected]>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to