Wrexsoul, Your right, I was out of line. I'm sorry. I should go through the effort to explain myself rather than resort to personal attacks.
Sean On Jun 17, 1:25 am, Wrexsoul <d2387...@bsnow.net> wrote: > On Jun 17, 12:57 am, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Daniel, don't feed the WrexTroll > > Personal attacks are unwelcome here. > > > > Indeed! It's called reduce: > > > >http://clojure.org/api#toc476 > > > > I'm shocked you haven't noticed it in the API documentation. > > I SPECIFICALLY did a search of the entire api docs to see if there was > anything like "accum" already in there. I examined every occurrence of > "seq" and turned up a blank. > > The docs definitely have problems if this can be missed despite a very > thorough search. The only more-thorough search would have been to > actually read the docs in their entirety, rather than to search them! > > > > Being able to read is one of the most basic, useful skills > > > in programming. > > This rudeness is uncalled-for. > > > > Especially if you want to be pompous without being an ass. > > Personal attacks are unwelcome here. > > > > Oh? What about compared to this: > > > > (use 'clojure.contrib.seq-utils) > > > > (def *tris* (reductions + (iterate inc 1))) > > Depends on a library that hasn't been released yet. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
