Hi Meikel, the name of the library is very general, while when reading its description it seems that it handles just a particular kind of implementation forms (JGoodies). I can also see that the use by a user requires the explicit usage of swing constructors.
So I was wondering whether you could make the name reflect the fact that it is more specific (to swing or jgoodies) ? Because it could be misleading. In fact, I thought at first (by just reading the name) that it was an abstraction over the creation of forms, be they swing or swt ? Just a suggestion, of course :-) 2009/6/30 Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de>: > Dear Clojurians, > > I herewith announce a new library: clj-forms. > > It provides a small embedded DSL to allow easy creation > of forms by providing a sequence of maps giving the > necessary information. The boilerplate is hidden in the > Forms driver. > > Here you can find an example: > http://kotka.de/projects/clojure/clj-forms.html > > The code is as usual on bitbucket.org: > http://bitbucket.org/kotarak/clj-forms > > This is a very new library. At the moment only PanelBuilder > is supported. > > Sincerely > Meikel > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
