On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 3:51 PM, John Harrop<jharrop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is frankly quite baffling. The changes to the function are
> innocent from a large-literal or pretty much any other perspective.

Both your functions load fine for me without the rest of
your code.  Are there type hints on the return values of any
of the functions called in your examples?

--Chouser

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to