I think your unquote is okay. ClojureQL does something similar. However, my gut says this should be in a doseq, not a for statement. Could be totally wrong, tough.
My $.02 Sean On Jul 6, 2:39 pm, Mike <cki...@gmail.com> wrote: > Newbie question here. Probably answered in Stu's book, but I forgot > it at home today. > > is: > > (for [x [1 2 3]] `(some-symbol ~x)) > > dangerous? I mean, assuming that some-symbol is bound and all. At > the REPL I get > > ((user/some-symbol 1) (user/some-symbol 2) (user/some-symbol 3)) > > which is what I'm interested in getting, but somehow the fact that > "for" is a macro and I'm escaping x assuming it's there is > disconcerting. > > Thanks for any style tips... > Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
