On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:06 PM, John Harrop <[email protected]> wrote:
> How about defining seqable? in terms of whether seq works, using try catch? > I think this is the only DRY way to do it, but I know Rich has expressed in the past the he does not approve of using exception handling as a form of flow control. Stephen Gilardi added a seqable? function to clojure.contrib.core here: http://github.com/richhickey/clojure-contrib/commit/bc07de7c3b1058f4263bd7b1c424f771fb010005 Regards, - J. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
