On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Laurent PETIT<laurent.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > BTW, > > is definline still considered experimental (I know it is still mentioned in > the doc, just asking whether it's up to date or not) ? >
Yes, still experimental. Rich > 2009/7/30 Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> >> >> The documentation is explicit that definline observes defmacro-like >> semantics. >> >> A.K.A. "What Rich said" :-) >> >> Stu >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > I am not sure to agree. >> > >> > If I get it right, definline is used to replace defn for function that >> > we want to be inlined. >> > >> > So replacing defn by definline should have no impact on the semantic >> > of >> > the program. >> > >> > >> > Best regards, >> > >> > >> > Nicolas. >> > >> > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 05:34 -0700, Rich Hickey wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 30, 1:29 am, John Harrop <jharrop...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> user=> (definline addsq [a b] `(+ (* ~a ~a) (* ~b ~b))) >> >>> #'hxr.clj.util/addsq >> >>> user=> (addsq (do (println "a evaluated") 1) 1) >> >>> a evaluated >> >>> a evaluated >> >>> 2 >> >> >> >> You write the expansion, so you are in control of multiple >> >> evaluation. >> >> >> >> Rich >> >>> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> >> > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
