On Aug 1, 7:24 pm, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Vagif Verdi<vagif.ve...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Since i'm using clojure in my business i got worried at a sudden > > thought what would happen to clojure if Ruch calls it a day. > > If Rich quit working on Clojure for whatever reason, it > would be a huge blow to the potential future of Clojure. > That is, Clojure is not yet done, and I don't know of anyone > with the focus, drive, and design sensibility needed to take > it to where it could be, other than Rich.
I think there is a huge difference between Clojure and Qi. Clojure was created by the author "for himself". Tarver created Qi so that others could go forth and program in it (application programming is something he claimed to have no interest in). For the record, I don't see the point of Qi whatsoever, but that's another (off-topic) story. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
