On Aug 7, 2009, at 2:59 AM, Lauri Pesonen wrote: > While maybe not as pretty as the one in contrib, it's not a monster > either. Shouldn't we aim for efficiency rather than elegance in > library routines (within reason)? I think the user will appreciate the > speedy version more than the pretty version. Since this change retains > the original interface, I would say go for it.
This is the difference between FreeBSD and NetBSD. I agree, but I also find it useful to crack open core and contrib to see coding examples and to understand algorithms. It's a balancing act. I'm definitely for this change though. I use reductions from time to time. — Daniel Lyons --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
