On Aug 19, 9:56 pm, CuppoJava <patrickli_2...@hotmail.com> wrote: > If I were to have my way, I would redefine all the clojure.core > functions to assume the "data" is the last argument instead of the > first. (this includes ->) This way they would play nice with both > partial and ->.
That's a really interesting idea. What happens if: (defmacro last-> ([x form] (if (seq? form) (concat form (list x)) (list form x))) ([x form & more] `(last-> (last-> ~x ~form) ~...@more))) -SS --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---