+1
On Aug 28, 9:41 am, Chas Emerick <cemer...@snowtide.com> wrote:
> Definitely +1, yes.
>
> - Chas
>
> On Aug 28, 2009, at 4:27 AM, Mike Hinchey wrote:
>
> > I have a suggestion for the with-open macro. It calls .close when
> > it's finished. I'd like it to have a (defmulti close type) so it's
> > behavior is extensible. A standard method could be defined for
> > java.io.Closeable and a :default method with no type hint. I've
> > come across a few cases where some external library defines what is
> > essentially a close method but names it shutdown or disable, etc.,
> > and defining my own close method would be much easier than rewriting
> > with-open. This would also allow people to eliminate reflection for
> > classes like sql Connection that were created before Closeable.
>
> > I'll submit a patch if it's wanted. This would fit in core, or
> > maybe contrib.duck-streams with a slightly different name.
>
> > -Mike
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
