Cool, I guess that there is no "one" correct answer but more a question of style & experience, the separation of logic & code mangling into two parts makes the most sense to me.
Ill continue to sharp my macro foo ;) On Aug 30, 8:16 pm, Vagif Verdi <vagif.ve...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would argue that macros always should be syntax wrappers for > functions. Coding the logic into a macro in most cases is a mistake. > So first write the function that does the work. Then write a macro > that simplifies a syntax to call that function. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
