On Sep 15, 10:23 pm, Mark Volkmann <r.mark.volkm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the problem is that you only ensure one of the Refs. If you
> want to make sure that a condition between multiple Refs isn't
> violated, you need to sure all of them. Otherwise other transactions
> will be free to modify the Refs that aren't ensured.
My reasoning is that since I am writing to one ref and ensuring the
other, I don't need to also ensure the ref I am writing to.
/Karl
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
