Also, I'm not sure if your understanding of "binding" is correct.
because within any lexical scope inside a function, I can > pretty much count on my bindings to never change. > binding is actually like a lexical re-def: user=> (def x 1) #'user/x user=> (binding [x 2] (pr x) (binding [x 3] (pr x)) x) 232 user=> x 1 This allows us to confine var re-def to specific scope, safely -- which is the convention over redefing a var globally. That's my understanding of it at least. Anyone can feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
