Hi, On Oct 9, 5:38 am, Allen Rohner <aroh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That is a good point. I'm actually not sure why I used type there. > It's probably a bug. Thanks for pointing it out. I would leave type here. Then the user can override the emit-function if he has self-defined types which need special handling for whatever reason. Sincerely Meikel --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
