On Oct 18, 12:29 am, Stuart Sierra <[email protected]> wrote: > I think this is intentional, because the multifn doesn't call the > dispatch function by name. Common usage is to use an anonymous fn for > the dispatch.
Ok, wrapping it in an anonymous function solves the problem; thanks! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
