On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Michel Salim <michael.silva...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Jim was working on logic programming in Clojure up to a few months > ago, and it seems as if the concern was that the code was too > derivative. > > I have recently made available a Scala-based Kanren implementation; > the differences between Scala and Scheme means that the code is > sufficiently original. Most of the code was written based on the > descriptions of how Mini Kanren works, and not the Scheme > implementation. And I have signed the Clojure contributor CA. > > Would a clean-room implementation based on the Scala code be > considered sufficiently owned for inclusion in contrib? >
That seems sufficiently about the ideas, and not copying the implementation. Rich --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
