On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Alex Osborne <a...@meshy.org> wrote:
> >
> > John Harrop wrote:
> >> Was something wrong with this?:
> >>
> >> (defn my-zipmap
> >> "Returns a map with the keys mapped to the corresponding vals."
> >> [keys vals]
> >> (into {} (map vec (partition 2 (interleave keys vals)))))
> >>
> >> :)
> >
> > One reason might be that the original zipmap is 5-10 times faster for
> > large numbers of entries as it doesn't create all the temporary seqs.
>
> Another might be that into, partition and interleave don't exist
> yet when zipmap is defined.
Eh. Implementation details.
That got me to poke in the source for into and:
(def
#^{:arglists '([coll x] [coll x & xs])
:doc "conj[oin]. Returns a new collection with the xs
'added'. (conj nil item) returns (item). The 'addition' may
happen at different 'places' depending on the concrete type."}
conj (fn conj
([coll x] (. clojure.lang.RT (conj coll x)))
([coll x & xs]
(if xs
(recur (conj coll x) (first xs) (next xs))
(conj coll x)))))
This is especially odd: the two-argument case appears to call itself
recursively to get the argument for a Java call.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
